Make Text Bigger/Smaller:   A A A

Necessity is the Mother of Invention

Post by: PCG Public Partnerships

Since 2005, The Chanda Plan Foundation has promoted wellness and healing to persons with physical disabilities through integrative therapies including acupuncture, massage, adaptive exercise and adaptive yoga. Founder Chanda Hinton Leichtle realized the benefits of integrative therapies when faced with her own mortality at age 21.

Through her determination to help other persons with physical disabilities, Leichtle has worked with Colorado policy makers to create the SCI Waiver, which will evaluate the cost efficiency and the value of integrative therapies for persons with physical disabilities over an eight-year span (2012-2020). Based on the data, Colorado could choose to cover integrative therapies, providing better health outcomes at low costs. The legislation could serve as a model and be used nationally. For Leichtle, this is far bigger than her. She says, “I can’t wait to see the impact we will make on our community and the opportunity this model will offer to others because we made sure to make it possible to replicate.”

Persons with physical disabilities can increase range of motion through massage therapy, increase blood flow and minimize the risk of blood clots. Acupuncture can aid in the recovery of a person with a physical disability by stimulating the nervous system according to practitioner Stephen Corsale.

The Chanda Plan Foundation is planning to move to a facility eight times larger than their current location. It is hoped that the new facility will garner more than 200 unique persons with disabilities in the first six months. Persons with physical disabilities will have more services to choose from, as the foundation seeks new practitioners to offer more services.

The foundation has collected $3.5 million of their $4 million goal to complete the building. Most of the money has come from grants and donations from the Colorado Health Foundation, the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation and the Boettcher Foundation. Learn more about this non-profit below:

Donate to the building fund here:

Penetration Rates in Participant Direction

Post by: Marc Fenton 

We have long observed that there are different penetration, or utilization rates in participant direction across the country. We know there are many reasons for this: state program priorities, budgets and waivers for new services, impact of advocates, legislative politics, state leadership, But we also know that there are differences among populations who are served.  In a recent international conference presentation Val Bradley, President of the Human Services Research Institute in Cambridge, MA, presented national data on penetration rates for participants with developmental and intellectual disabilities.  Val stated that these rates have plateaued at 8% to 10% nationally. Looking at the data that PCG-Public Partnerships has collected from various states shows that the population with DD and IDD is usually in the single digits. In contrast, the penetration rates of those with disabilities and problems of aging are much higher -up to 40% to 45%.  

The Wyoming RFP we recently received calls for a proposal to serve both populations. We are currently serving 343 participants in the DD/IDD waiver, or about 15% of those eligible.  For the long term care waiver serving elder and disabled the population served is 1542 or a penetration rate of 41%.  This is a state that has been prominent in offering self-direction as a choice to both populations.

In a recent conversation with Nancy Thaler, the new PA Assistant Secretary of the Office of Persons with Disabilities (OPD), agreed with my observation of different penetration rates and offered a clear and insightful reason why. “People who are aging or disabled are looking to maintain their independence as they age; they don’t want to lose any elements of independence.  Self –direction is an easy sell because it promises them continued independence” she observed. “People with intellectual and developmental disabilities are usually receiving services, often substantial services, and they and their families feel they are at risk of losing services if they self-direct.  It is a risky sell.”  I think she is right.